Chisel vs frp
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Chisel
Fast TCP/UDP tunnel over HTTP secured by SSH
VS
frp
Fast reverse proxy to expose local servers behind NAT
| Feature | Chisel | frp |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 16,362 | ★ 108,622 |
| First released | 2015 | 2016 |
| Replaces | ngrok | ngrok |
Why pick each one
Choose Chisel if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 16.4k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose frp if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 108.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Chisel or frp better?
Neither is universally better. frp has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Chisel and frp free and open-source?
Yes. Chisel is licensed under MIT and frp under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Chisel and frp with Docker?
Chisel: yes. frp: yes.