Enclosed vs Spacedrive

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEnclosedSpacedrive
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptRust
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary
GitHub stars★ 2,046★ 38,732
First released20252022
ReplacesGoogle Drive, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Enclosed if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Enclosed details

Choose Spacedrive if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 38.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Spacedrive details

Frequently asked questions

Is Enclosed or Spacedrive better?

Neither is universally better. Spacedrive has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Enclosed and Spacedrive free and open-source?

Yes. Enclosed is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Spacedrive under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Enclosed and Spacedrive with Docker?

Enclosed: yes. Spacedrive: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons