Enclosed vs LocalSend

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEnclosedLocalSend
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptDart
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary
GitHub stars★ 2,046★ 87,025
First released20252022
ReplacesAirDrop

Why pick each one

Choose Enclosed if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Enclosed details

Choose LocalSend if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 87k GitHub stars
  • Written in Dart
LocalSend details

Frequently asked questions

Is Enclosed or LocalSend better?

LocalSend is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Enclosed if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Enclosed and LocalSend free and open-source?

Yes. Enclosed is licensed under Apache-2.0 and LocalSend under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Enclosed and LocalSend with Docker?

Enclosed: yes. LocalSend: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons