Enclosed vs File Browser

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEnclosedFile Browser
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,046★ 35,800
First released20252017
ReplacesDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Enclosed if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Enclosed details

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Frequently asked questions

Is Enclosed or File Browser better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Enclosed if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Enclosed and File Browser free and open-source?

Yes. Enclosed is licensed under Apache-2.0 and File Browser under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Enclosed and File Browser with Docker?

Enclosed: yes. File Browser: yes.

Related comparisons