File Browser vs Spacedrive

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserSpacedrive
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 38,732
First released20172022
ReplacesDropboxGoogle Drive, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Spacedrive if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 38.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Spacedrive details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Spacedrive better?

Neither is universally better. Spacedrive has the larger community, while File Browser is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are File Browser and Spacedrive free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Spacedrive under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Spacedrive with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Spacedrive: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons