Maddy Mail Server vs mailcow
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Maddy Mail Server
Composable, all-in-one mail server in Go
VS
mailcow
Dockerized full-stack mail server suite
| Feature | Maddy Mail Server | mailcow |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 6,144 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,060 | ★ 13,245 |
| First released | 2019 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 | Microsoft Exchange, Google Workspace |
Why pick each one
Choose Maddy Mail Server if…
- Drastically simpler than traditional stacks
- Low resource use
Frequently asked questions
Is Maddy Mail Server or mailcow better?
Neither is universally better. mailcow has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Maddy Mail Server and mailcow free and open-source?
Yes. Maddy Mail Server is licensed under GPL-3.0 and mailcow under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Maddy Mail Server and mailcow with Docker?
Maddy Mail Server: yes. mailcow: yes.
Related comparisons
- Maddy Mail Server vs AnonAddy
- mailcow vs AnonAddy
- Maddy Mail Server vs Calligra Suite
- Maddy Mail Server vs Collabora Online
- Maddy Mail Server vs Cozy
- mailcow vs Cozy
- Maddy Mail Server vs CryptPad
- Maddy Mail Server vs chasquid
- mailcow vs chasquid
- Maddy Mail Server vs Docker Mailserver
- mailcow vs Docker Mailserver