chasquid vs Maddy Mail Server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
chasquid
Simple, easy-to-configure SMTP server
VS
Maddy Mail Server
Composable, all-in-one mail server in Go
| Feature | chasquid | Maddy Mail Server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 977 | ★ 6,060 |
| First released | 2016 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Google Workspace | Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 |
Why pick each one
Choose chasquid if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Maddy Mail Server if…
- Drastically simpler than traditional stacks
- Low resource use
Frequently asked questions
Is chasquid or Maddy Mail Server better?
Neither is universally better. Maddy Mail Server has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are chasquid and Maddy Mail Server free and open-source?
Yes. chasquid is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Maddy Mail Server under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run chasquid and Maddy Mail Server with Docker?
chasquid: yes. Maddy Mail Server: yes.