Mail-in-a-Box vs mailcow

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMail-in-a-Boxmailcow
CategoryMail ServersMail Servers
LicenseCC0-1.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePythonJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB6,144 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, one-clickdocker
GitHub stars★ 15,385★ 13,245
First released20142016
ReplacesGoogle Workspace, Microsoft 365Microsoft Exchange, Google Workspace

Why pick each one

Choose Mail-in-a-Box if…

  • Very beginner-friendly
  • Opinionated, complete stack
Mail-in-a-Box details

Choose mailcow if…

  • All components preconfigured
  • Active community
mailcow details

Frequently asked questions

Is Mail-in-a-Box or mailcow better?

Mail-in-a-Box is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider mailcow if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Mail-in-a-Box and mailcow free and open-source?

Yes. Mail-in-a-Box is licensed under CC0-1.0 and mailcow under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Mail-in-a-Box and mailcow with Docker?

Mail-in-a-Box: check the project docs for container support. mailcow: yes.

Related comparisons