ejabberd vs JSXC
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | ejabberd | JSXC |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Erlang | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,711 | ★ 732 |
| First released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Slack, WhatsApp | Slack |
Why pick each one
Choose JSXC if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is ejabberd or JSXC better?
Neither is universally better. ejabberd has the larger community, while JSXC is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ejabberd and JSXC free and open-source?
Yes. ejabberd is licensed under GPL-2.0 and JSXC under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ejabberd and JSXC with Docker?
ejabberd: yes. JSXC: check the project docs for container support.