Continuwuity vs JSXC
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Continuwuity
Community-maintained Rust Matrix homeserver
VS
JSXC
JavaScript XMPP client for the browser
| Feature | Continuwuity | JSXC |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Rust | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 700 | ★ 731 |
| First released | 2024 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Slack, Discord | Slack |
What are Continuwuity and JSXC?
Continuwuity
Continuwuity is a community continuation of the conduwuit Matrix homeserver, written in Rust. It provides an efficient, federated Matrix server with a focus on stability and ongoing maintenance.
- Drop-in conduwuit replacement
- Active community maintenance
- Efficient single binary
- Full Matrix federation
JSXC
JSXC is a real-time XMPP chat application that runs in the browser and can be integrated into web platforms like Nextcloud and SOGo. It supports OTR and OMEMO encryption.
- Browser-based XMPP client
- OTR and OMEMO encryption
- Integrates with Nextcloud
- Audio and video via WebRTC
Continuwuity vs JSXC: key differences
Continuwuity is written in Rust, while JSXC is built with TypeScript. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for Continuwuity versus MIT for JSXC. JSXC is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Continuwuity. JSXC is the more established project (first released 2013), while Continuwuity arrived in 2024. Continuwuity lists first-class Docker deployment; JSXC does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Continuwuity if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose JSXC if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Watch out for
- Needs an XMPP backend
- Integration-focused
Frequently asked questions
Is Continuwuity or JSXC better?
Neither is universally better. JSXC has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Continuwuity and JSXC free and open-source?
Yes. Continuwuity is licensed under Apache-2.0 and JSXC under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Continuwuity and JSXC with Docker?
Continuwuity: yes. JSXC: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Continuwuity or JSXC?
JSXC has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Continuwuity. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.