Duplicity vs Backup tool nono Plakar
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Duplicity
Encrypted bandwidth-efficient backup using rsync
VS
Backup tool nono Plakar
Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI
| Feature | Duplicity | Backup tool nono Plakar |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | GPL-2.0 | ISC |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 300 | ★ 2,013 |
| First released | 2002 | 2021 |
| Replaces | CrashPlan, Backblaze | Backblaze, CrashPlan |
Why pick each one
Choose Duplicity if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Duplicity or Backup tool nono Plakar better?
Neither is universally better. Backup tool nono Plakar has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Duplicity and Backup tool nono Plakar free and open-source?
Yes. Duplicity is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Backup tool nono Plakar under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Duplicity and Backup tool nono Plakar with Docker?
Duplicity: check the project docs for container support. Backup tool nono Plakar: yes.