Vorta vs Backup tool nono Plakar
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Vorta
Desktop backup client built on BorgBackup
VS
Backup tool nono Plakar
Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI
| Feature | Vorta | Backup tool nono Plakar |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | GPL-3.0 | ISC |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,490 | ★ 2,013 |
| First released | 2018 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Time Machine, CrashPlan | Backblaze, CrashPlan |
Why pick each one
Choose Vorta if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Vorta or Backup tool nono Plakar better?
Vorta is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Backup tool nono Plakar if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Vorta and Backup tool nono Plakar free and open-source?
Yes. Vorta is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Backup tool nono Plakar under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Vorta and Backup tool nono Plakar with Docker?
Vorta: check the project docs for container support. Backup tool nono Plakar: yes.