TimeTracker vs Traggo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
TimeTracker
Self-hosted web-based time tracking for teams
VS
Traggo
Tag-based time tracking without rigid project hierarchies
| Feature | TimeTracker | Traggo |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 80 · Excellent | 79 · Good |
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 628 | ★ 1,633 |
| First released | 2024 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Toggl, Harvest | Toggl, Clockify |
What are TimeTracker and Traggo?
TimeTracker
TimeTracker is a self-hosted web-based time tracking application for freelancers, teams, and businesses. It manages projects, logs billable time, and generates invoices, keeping all data under your control.
- Project-based time logging
- Invoice generation
- Multi-user accounts
- Self-hosted data control
Traggo
Traggo is a tag-based time tracking tool. Instead of fixed projects and tasks, every tracked entry is described by tags, giving flexible reporting and analysis.
- Tag-based time entries
- Flexible custom dashboards
- Single binary deployment
- Lightweight resource usage
TimeTracker vs Traggo: key differences
TimeTracker is written in Python, while Traggo is built with Go. Licensing differs — MIT for TimeTracker versus GPL-3.0 for Traggo. Traggo is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for TimeTracker. Traggo is the more established project (first released 2019), while TimeTracker arrived in 2024. Traggo has the considerably larger community, at 1,633 GitHub stars versus 628.
Why pick each one
Choose TimeTracker if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Traggo if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is TimeTracker or Traggo better?
Traggo is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider TimeTracker if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are TimeTracker and Traggo free and open-source?
Yes. TimeTracker is licensed under MIT and Traggo under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run TimeTracker and Traggo with Docker?
TimeTracker: yes. Traggo: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, TimeTracker or Traggo?
Traggo has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for TimeTracker. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.