Drone vs TeamCity
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted ci/cd & build options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Drone | TeamCity |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CI/CD & Build | CI/CD & Build |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 37,713 | — |
| First released | 2014 | 2006 |
| Replaces | Jenkins, CircleCI | Jenkins, CircleCI |
Why pick each one
Choose TeamCity if…
- Released under the Proprietary license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Java
Frequently asked questions
Is Drone or TeamCity better?
Neither is universally better. Drone has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Drone and TeamCity free and open-source?
Yes. Drone is licensed under Apache-2.0 and TeamCity under Proprietary. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Drone and TeamCity with Docker?
Drone: yes. TeamCity: yes.