SHSelfHostIndex

Buildkite Agent vs Drone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted ci/cd & build options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BU Buildkite Agent Self-hosted CI/CD agent for your own infrastructure VS DR Drone Container-based continuous delivery platform
FeatureBuildkite AgentDrone
CategoryCI/CD & BuildCI/CD & Build
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 1,035★ 37,713
First released20142014
ReplacesGitHub Actions, CircleCIJenkins, CircleCI

Why pick each one

Choose Buildkite Agent if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
Buildkite Agent details

Choose Drone if…

  • Clean container model
  • Configuration as code
  • Scales with runners
Drone details

Frequently asked questions

Is Buildkite Agent or Drone better?

Neither is universally better. Drone has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Buildkite Agent and Drone free and open-source?

Yes. Buildkite Agent is licensed under MIT and Drone under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Buildkite Agent and Drone with Docker?

Buildkite Agent: yes. Drone: yes.

Related comparisons