GoCD vs TeamCity
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted ci/cd & build options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | GoCD | TeamCity |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CI/CD & Build | CI/CD & Build |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary |
| Language | Java | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,419 | — |
| First released | 2014 | 2006 |
| Replaces | Jenkins | Jenkins, CircleCI |
Why pick each one
Choose GoCD if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 7.4k GitHub stars
Choose TeamCity if…
- Released under the Proprietary license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Java
Frequently asked questions
Is GoCD or TeamCity better?
Neither is universally better. GoCD has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are GoCD and TeamCity free and open-source?
Yes. GoCD is licensed under Apache-2.0 and TeamCity under Proprietary. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GoCD and TeamCity with Docker?
GoCD: yes. TeamCity: yes.