Double Take vs RPi Cam Web Interface
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Double Take
Unified UI and API for face recognition on camera feeds
VS
RPi Cam Web Interface
Web-based control and streaming for the Raspberry Pi camera
| Feature | Double Take | RPi Cam Web Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,435 | ★ 1,599 |
| First released | 2021 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Nest Cam | Nest Cam |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Double Take or RPi Cam Web Interface better?
RPi Cam Web Interface is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Double Take if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Double Take and RPi Cam Web Interface free and open-source?
Yes. Double Take is licensed under MIT and RPi Cam Web Interface under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Double Take and RPi Cam Web Interface with Docker?
Double Take: yes. RPi Cam Web Interface: check the project docs for container support.
Related comparisons
- Double Take vs WebRTC Camera
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs WebRTC Camera
- Double Take vs Cameradar
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs Cameradar
- Double Take vs Camera.UI
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs Camera.UI
- Double Take vs CompreFace
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs CompreFace
- Double Take vs Sighthound Surveillance Station
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs Sighthound Surveillance Station