Kerberos Agent vs RPi Cam Web Interface
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Kerberos Agent | RPi Cam Web Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 83 · Excellent | 19 · At risk |
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,121 | ★ 1,599 |
| First released | 2014 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Nest Cam | Nest Cam |
What are Kerberos Agent and RPi Cam Web Interface?
Kerberos Agent
Kerberos Agent is a lightweight, single-camera video surveillance application that detects motion and stores recordings locally or in the cloud. Multiple agents can be managed centrally with Kerberos Hub.
- Single-camera agent design
- Motion detection
- Local and cloud storage
- Kubernetes friendly
RPi Cam Web Interface
RPi Cam Web Interface is a web-based control panel for the Raspberry Pi camera module, offering live streaming, recording, and motion detection. It is a popular choice for simple DIY surveillance projects.
- Live camera streaming
- Recording and snapshots
- Motion detection
- Web control panel
Kerberos Agent vs RPi Cam Web Interface: key differences
Kerberos Agent is written in Go, while RPi Cam Web Interface is built with PHP. RPi Cam Web Interface is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Kerberos Agent. Kerberos Agent lists first-class Docker deployment; RPi Cam Web Interface does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Kerberos Agent if…
- Lightweight per-camera model
- Scales with orchestration
Watch out for
- One agent per camera
- Hub needed for central view
Choose RPi Cam Web Interface if…
- Easy DIY setup
- Lightweight
Watch out for
- Raspberry Pi camera only
- Single-camera use
Frequently asked questions
Is Kerberos Agent or RPi Cam Web Interface better?
RPi Cam Web Interface is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Kerberos Agent if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Kerberos Agent and RPi Cam Web Interface free and open-source?
Yes. Kerberos Agent is licensed under MIT and RPi Cam Web Interface under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kerberos Agent and RPi Cam Web Interface with Docker?
Kerberos Agent: yes. RPi Cam Web Interface: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Kerberos Agent or RPi Cam Web Interface?
RPi Cam Web Interface has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Kerberos Agent. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- Kerberos Agent vs Camera.UI
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs Camera.UI
- Kerberos Agent vs DOODS2
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs DOODS2
- Kerberos Agent vs Double Take
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs Double Take
- Kerberos Agent vs Frigate Notify
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs Frigate Notify
- Kerberos Agent vs go2rtc
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs go2rtc