SHSelfHostIndex

Kerberos Agent vs RPi Cam Web Interface

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
KE Kerberos Agent Lightweight video surveillance agent for a single camera VS RP RPi Cam Web Interface Web-based control and streaming for the Raspberry Pi camera
FeatureKerberos AgentRPi Cam Web Interface
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoPHP
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 1,088★ 1,599
First released20142013
ReplacesNest CamNest Cam

Why pick each one

Choose Kerberos Agent if…

  • Lightweight per-camera model
  • Scales with orchestration
Kerberos Agent details

Choose RPi Cam Web Interface if…

  • Easy DIY setup
  • Lightweight
RPi Cam Web Interface details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kerberos Agent or RPi Cam Web Interface better?

RPi Cam Web Interface is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Kerberos Agent if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Kerberos Agent and RPi Cam Web Interface free and open-source?

Yes. Kerberos Agent is licensed under MIT and RPi Cam Web Interface under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kerberos Agent and RPi Cam Web Interface with Docker?

Kerberos Agent: yes. RPi Cam Web Interface: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons