Doctave vs MediaWiki

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted wikis & documentation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDoctaveMediaWiki
CategoryWikis & DocumentationWikis & Documentation
LicenseMITGPL-2.0
LanguageRustPHP
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 669★ 5,135
First released20212002
ReplacesConfluence, GitBookConfluence, Notion

Why pick each one

Choose Doctave if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Doctave details

Choose MediaWiki if…

  • Battle-tested at massive scale
  • Huge extension ecosystem
MediaWiki details

Frequently asked questions

Is Doctave or MediaWiki better?

Neither is universally better. MediaWiki has the larger community, while Doctave is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Doctave and MediaWiki free and open-source?

Yes. Doctave is licensed under MIT and MediaWiki under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Doctave and MediaWiki with Docker?

Doctave: check the project docs for container support. MediaWiki: yes.

Related comparisons