Dendron vs Doctave

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted wikis & documentation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDendronDoctave
CategoryWikis & DocumentationWikis & Documentation
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptRust
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentsource, binarybinary, source
GitHub stars★ 7,458★ 669
First released20202021
ReplacesNotion, ConfluenceConfluence, GitBook

Why pick each one

Choose Dendron if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 7.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Dendron details

Choose Doctave if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Doctave details

Frequently asked questions

Is Dendron or Doctave better?

Neither is universally better. Dendron has the larger community, while Doctave is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Dendron and Doctave free and open-source?

Yes. Dendron is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Doctave under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Dendron and Doctave with Docker?

Dendron: check the project docs for container support. Doctave: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons