Antora vs Doctave
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted wikis & documentation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Antora
Multi-repository documentation site generator
VS
Doctave
Markdown documentation site generator with search
| Feature | Antora | Doctave |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Wikis & Documentation | Wikis & Documentation |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 800 | ★ 669 |
| First released | 2017 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Confluence, GitBook | Confluence, GitBook |
Why pick each one
Choose Doctave if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Antora or Doctave better?
Neither is universally better. Antora has the larger community, while Doctave is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Antora and Doctave free and open-source?
Yes. Antora is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Doctave under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Antora and Doctave with Docker?
Antora: check the project docs for container support. Doctave: check the project docs for container support.