Antora vs Docusaurus
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted wikis & documentation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Antora
Multi-repository documentation site generator
VS
Docusaurus
Documentation website generator built with React
| Feature | Antora | Docusaurus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Wikis & Documentation | Wikis & Documentation |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 800 | ★ 65,862 |
| First released | 2017 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Confluence, GitBook | GitBook, Confluence |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Antora or Docusaurus better?
Neither is universally better. Docusaurus has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Antora and Docusaurus free and open-source?
Yes. Antora is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Docusaurus under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Antora and Docusaurus with Docker?
Antora: check the project docs for container support. Docusaurus: check the project docs for container support.