dnscrypt-proxy vs Kong Gateway

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurednscrypt-proxyKong Gateway
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseISCApache-2.0
LanguageGoLua
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 13,554★ 43,947
First released20182015
ReplacesCloudflare WARPAWS API Gateway, Apigee

Why pick each one

Choose dnscrypt-proxy if…

  • Released under the ISC license
  • Mature project with 13.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
dnscrypt-proxy details

Choose Kong Gateway if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 43.9k GitHub stars
Kong Gateway details

Frequently asked questions

Is dnscrypt-proxy or Kong Gateway better?

Neither is universally better. Kong Gateway has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are dnscrypt-proxy and Kong Gateway free and open-source?

Yes. dnscrypt-proxy is licensed under ISC and Kong Gateway under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run dnscrypt-proxy and Kong Gateway with Docker?

dnscrypt-proxy: check the project docs for container support. Kong Gateway: yes.

Related comparisons