django CMS vs Squidex
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
django CMS
Enterprise CMS built on the Django framework
VS
Squidex
Headless CMS, based on MongoDB, CQRS and Event Sourcing
| Feature | django CMS | Squidex |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | Python | C# |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,658 | ★ 2,509 |
| First released | 2009 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Squidex if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in C#
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is django CMS or Squidex better?
Neither is universally better. django CMS has the larger community, while Squidex is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are django CMS and Squidex free and open-source?
Yes. django CMS is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Squidex under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run django CMS and Squidex with Docker?
django CMS: yes. Squidex: check the project docs for container support.