Automad vs django CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Automad
Flat-file CMS and template engine in one
VS
django CMS
Enterprise CMS built on the Django framework
| Feature | Automad | django CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 926 | ★ 10,658 |
| First released | 2014 | 2009 |
| Replaces | WordPress | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Automad or django CMS better?
Neither is universally better. django CMS has the larger community, while Automad is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Automad and django CMS free and open-source?
Yes. Automad is licensed under MIT and django CMS under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Automad and django CMS with Docker?
Automad: yes. django CMS: yes.