299Ko vs django CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
299Ko
Simple, fast & lightweight flat-file CMS
VS
django CMS
Enterprise CMS built on the Django framework
| Feature | 299Ko | django CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | PHP | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 23 | ★ 10,658 |
| First released | 2025 | 2009 |
| Replaces | — | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore |
Why pick each one
Choose 299Ko if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is 299Ko or django CMS better?
Neither is universally better. django CMS has the larger community, while 299Ko is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are 299Ko and django CMS free and open-source?
Yes. 299Ko is licensed under GPL-3.0 and django CMS under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run 299Ko and django CMS with Docker?
299Ko: check the project docs for container support. django CMS: yes.