ClassicPress vs django CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ClassicPress
Community-led WordPress fork without the block editor
VS
django CMS
Enterprise CMS built on the Django framework
| Feature | ClassicPress | django CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | GPL-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | PHP | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker, one-click | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 856 | ★ 10,658 |
| First released | 2018 | 2009 |
| Replaces | WordPress | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore |
Why pick each one
Choose ClassicPress if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
Frequently asked questions
Is ClassicPress or django CMS better?
Neither is universally better. django CMS has the larger community, while ClassicPress is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ClassicPress and django CMS free and open-source?
Yes. ClassicPress is licensed under GPL-2.0 and django CMS under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ClassicPress and django CMS with Docker?
ClassicPress: yes. django CMS: yes.