ClassicPress vs October CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ClassicPress
Community-led WordPress fork without the block editor
VS
October CMS
Laravel-based CMS focused on simplicity for developers
| Feature | ClassicPress | October CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker, one-click | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 856 | ★ 11,140 |
| First released | 2018 | 2014 |
| Replaces | WordPress | WordPress, Wix |
Why pick each one
Choose ClassicPress if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
Choose October CMS if…
- Great for Laravel developers
- Simple, transparent architecture
Frequently asked questions
Is ClassicPress or October CMS better?
Neither is universally better. October CMS has the larger community, while ClassicPress is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ClassicPress and October CMS free and open-source?
Yes. ClassicPress is licensed under GPL-2.0 and October CMS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ClassicPress and October CMS with Docker?
ClassicPress: yes. October CMS: yes.