django CMS vs Sphido
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
django CMS
Enterprise CMS built on the Django framework
VS
Sphido
Flat-file CMS that builds simple websites from folders
| Feature | django CMS | Sphido |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,658 | ★ 37 |
| First released | 2009 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore | WordPress |
Why pick each one
Choose Sphido if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is django CMS or Sphido better?
Neither is universally better. django CMS has the larger community, while Sphido is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are django CMS and Sphido free and open-source?
Yes. django CMS is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Sphido under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run django CMS and Sphido with Docker?
django CMS: yes. Sphido: yes.