django CMS vs OJS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
django CMS
Enterprise CMS built on the Django framework
VS
OJS
Software to manage scholarly journals
| Feature | django CMS | OJS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0-only |
| Language | Python | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,658 | ★ 1,025 |
| First released | 2009 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore | — |
Why pick each one
Choose OJS if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0-only license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1k GitHub stars)
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is django CMS or OJS better?
Neither is universally better. django CMS has the larger community, while OJS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are django CMS and OJS free and open-source?
Yes. django CMS is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and OJS under GPL-3.0-only. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run django CMS and OJS with Docker?
django CMS: yes. OJS: check the project docs for container support.