django CMS vs Noosfero
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
django CMS
Enterprise CMS built on the Django framework
VS
Noosfero
Platform for social and solidarity economy networks with blog,
| Feature | django CMS | Noosfero |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,658 | ★ 65 |
| First released | 2009 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Noosfero if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Written in Ruby
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is django CMS or Noosfero better?
Neither is universally better. django CMS has the larger community, while Noosfero is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are django CMS and Noosfero free and open-source?
Yes. django CMS is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Noosfero under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run django CMS and Noosfero with Docker?
django CMS: yes. Noosfero: check the project docs for container support.