django CMS vs Lionwiki
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
django CMS
Enterprise CMS built on the Django framework
VS
Lionwiki
Lightweight wiki-style CMS using the txt2tags syntax
| Feature | django CMS | Lionwiki |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | Python | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,658 | ★ 6 |
| First released | 2009 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Lionwiki if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is django CMS or Lionwiki better?
Neither is universally better. django CMS has the larger community, while Lionwiki is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are django CMS and Lionwiki free and open-source?
Yes. django CMS is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Lionwiki under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run django CMS and Lionwiki with Docker?
django CMS: yes. Lionwiki: check the project docs for container support.