django CMS vs ImpressPages
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
django CMS
Enterprise CMS built on the Django framework
VS
ImpressPages
PHP CMS with inline drag-and-drop page editing
| Feature | django CMS | ImpressPages |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,658 | ★ 500 |
| First released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore | WordPress, Wix |
Why pick each one
Choose ImpressPages if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is django CMS or ImpressPages better?
Neither is universally better. django CMS has the larger community, while ImpressPages is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are django CMS and ImpressPages free and open-source?
Yes. django CMS is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and ImpressPages under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run django CMS and ImpressPages with Docker?
django CMS: yes. ImpressPages: yes.