Diacamma vs Paheko

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDiacammaPaheko
CategoryProject Management & TasksProject Management & Tasks
LicenseGPL-3.0-or-laterAGPL-3.0-or-later
Language
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM50 MB200 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars
First released20232023
ReplacesAssoConnect, Ciel Associations, HelloAssoCiel Associations

Why pick each one

Choose Diacamma if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Diacamma details

Choose Paheko if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 200 MB RAM
Paheko details

Frequently asked questions

Is Diacamma or Paheko better?

Neither is universally better. Diacamma has the larger community, while Paheko is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Diacamma and Paheko free and open-source?

Yes. Diacamma is licensed under GPL-3.0-or-later and Paheko under AGPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Diacamma and Paheko with Docker?

Diacamma: check the project docs for container support. Paheko: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons