Diacamma vs Habitica Self-Hosted
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Diacamma
Management application for volunteers (association, condominium)
VS
Habitica Self-Hosted
Gamified task and habit manager for personal productivity
| Feature | Diacamma | Habitica Self-Hosted |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | GPL-3.0-or-later | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | — | ★ 14,044 |
| First released | 2023 | 2013 |
| Replaces | AssoConnect, Ciel Associations, HelloAsso | Todoist, Habitica |
Why pick each one
Choose Diacamma if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Diacamma or Habitica Self-Hosted better?
Neither is universally better. Habitica Self-Hosted has the larger community, while Diacamma is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Diacamma and Habitica Self-Hosted free and open-source?
Yes. Diacamma is licensed under GPL-3.0-or-later and Habitica Self-Hosted under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Diacamma and Habitica Self-Hosted with Docker?
Diacamma: check the project docs for container support. Habitica Self-Hosted: yes.