Diacamma vs Focalboard
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Diacamma
Management application for volunteers (association, condominium)
VS
Focalboard
Open-source project and task management boards
| Feature | Diacamma | Focalboard |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | GPL-3.0-or-later | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | — | ★ 26,376 |
| First released | 2023 | 2021 |
| Replaces | AssoConnect, Ciel Associations, HelloAsso | Trello, Asana, Notion |
Why pick each one
Choose Diacamma if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Diacamma or Focalboard better?
Focalboard is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Diacamma if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Diacamma and Focalboard free and open-source?
Yes. Diacamma is licensed under GPL-3.0-or-later and Focalboard under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Diacamma and Focalboard with Docker?
Diacamma: check the project docs for container support. Focalboard: yes.