Defguard vs frp
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Defguard
WireGuard VPN and identity platform with MFA
VS
frp
Fast reverse proxy to expose local servers behind NAT
| Feature | Defguard | frp |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,798 | ★ 108,622 |
| First released | 2023 | 2016 |
| Replaces | OpenVPN Access Server, Twingate | ngrok |
Why pick each one
Choose Defguard if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Rust
Choose frp if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 108.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Defguard or frp better?
Neither is universally better. frp has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Defguard and frp free and open-source?
Yes. Defguard is licensed under Apache-2.0 and frp under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Defguard and frp with Docker?
Defguard: yes. frp: yes.