DDNS-Go vs Traefik

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDDNS-GoTraefik
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 17,177★ 64,330
First released20202015
ReplacesNo-IP, DynDNSHAProxy, AWS ELB

Why pick each one

Choose DDNS-Go if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 17.2k GitHub stars
DDNS-Go details

Choose Traefik if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 64.3k GitHub stars
Traefik details

Frequently asked questions

Is DDNS-Go or Traefik better?

Neither is universally better. Traefik has the larger community, while DDNS-Go is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are DDNS-Go and Traefik free and open-source?

Yes. DDNS-Go is licensed under MIT and Traefik under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run DDNS-Go and Traefik with Docker?

DDNS-Go: yes. Traefik: yes.

Related comparisons