croc vs PicoShare

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocPicoShare
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 2,971
First released20182021
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropDropbox, WeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose PicoShare if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3k GitHub stars)
PicoShare details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or PicoShare better?

Neither is universally better. croc has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are croc and PicoShare free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and PicoShare under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and PicoShare with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. PicoShare: yes.

Related comparisons