copyparty vs Restic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecopypartyRestic
CategoryFile Sync & StorageBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITBSD-2-Clause
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 46,121★ 35,412
First released20192015
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose Restic if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Efficient deduplication
  • Wide backend support
Restic details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or Restic better?

copyparty is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Restic if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are copyparty and Restic free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Restic under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and Restic with Docker?

copyparty: yes. Restic: yes.

Related comparisons