copyparty vs Rclone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecopypartyRclone
CategoryFile Sync & StorageBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 46,121★ 58,995
First released20192014
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveBackblaze

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose Rclone if…

  • Works with almost any cloud
  • Extremely versatile
  • Reliable
Rclone details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or Rclone better?

Neither is universally better. Rclone has the larger community, while copyparty is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are copyparty and Rclone free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Rclone under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and Rclone with Docker?

copyparty: yes. Rclone: yes.

Related comparisons