copyparty vs pgBackRest

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecopypartypgBackRest
CategoryFile Sync & StorageBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePythonC
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 46,121★ 4,296
First released20192013
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveVeeam

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose pgBackRest if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
pgBackRest details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or pgBackRest better?

copyparty is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider pgBackRest if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are copyparty and pgBackRest free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and pgBackRest under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and pgBackRest with Docker?

copyparty: yes. pgBackRest: yes.

Related comparisons