Backrest vs pgBackRest

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBackrestpgBackRest
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptC
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 7,071★ 4,296
First released20242013
ReplacesBackblazeVeeam

Why pick each one

Choose Backrest if…

  • Makes Restic approachable
  • Good scheduling
  • Lightweight
Backrest details

Choose pgBackRest if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
pgBackRest details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backrest or pgBackRest better?

Backrest is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider pgBackRest if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Backrest and pgBackRest free and open-source?

Yes. Backrest is licensed under GPL-3.0 and pgBackRest under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backrest and pgBackRest with Docker?

Backrest: yes. pgBackRest: yes.

Related comparisons