Contao vs Keystone
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Contao
Accessible open-source CMS for professional websites
VS
Keystone
Headless CMS framework with a powerful GraphQL API
| Feature | Contao | Keystone |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 435 | ★ 9,938 |
| First released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Joomla | Contentful, Strapi |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Contao or Keystone better?
Neither is universally better. Keystone has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Contao and Keystone free and open-source?
Yes. Contao is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and Keystone under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Contao and Keystone with Docker?
Contao: yes. Keystone: yes.