CMS Made Simple vs Keystone
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CMS Made Simple
Flexible CMS for small and medium business sites
VS
Keystone
Headless CMS framework with a powerful GraphQL API
| Feature | CMS Made Simple | Keystone |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 20 | ★ 9,938 |
| First released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Joomla | Contentful, Strapi |
Why pick each one
Choose CMS Made Simple if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is CMS Made Simple or Keystone better?
Neither is universally better. Keystone has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are CMS Made Simple and Keystone free and open-source?
Yes. CMS Made Simple is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Keystone under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CMS Made Simple and Keystone with Docker?
CMS Made Simple: check the project docs for container support. Keystone: yes.