Remark42 vs Zammad
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Remark42
Privacy-focused lightweight commenting engine
VS
Zammad
Web-based helpdesk and customer support system
| Feature | Remark42 | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,574 | ★ 5,834 |
| First released | 2017 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Disqus | Zendesk, Freshdesk |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Remark42 or Zammad better?
Neither is universally better. Zammad has the larger community, while Remark42 is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Remark42 and Zammad free and open-source?
Yes. Remark42 is licensed under MIT and Zammad under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Remark42 and Zammad with Docker?
Remark42: yes. Zammad: yes.