Centrifugo vs Zammad

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCentrifugoZammad
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoRuby
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 10,590★ 5,834
First released20152016
ReplacesPusher, Firebase Realtime DatabaseZendesk, Freshdesk

Why pick each one

Choose Centrifugo if…

  • Handles many connections
  • Easy to integrate
Centrifugo details

Choose Zammad if…

  • Mature support workflow
  • Good integrations
Zammad details

Frequently asked questions

Is Centrifugo or Zammad better?

Neither is universally better. Centrifugo has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Centrifugo and Zammad free and open-source?

Yes. Centrifugo is licensed under MIT and Zammad under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Centrifugo and Zammad with Docker?

Centrifugo: yes. Zammad: yes.

Related comparisons