Cloudreve vs Magic Wormhole
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cloudreve
File management and sharing system, supports multiple storage
VS
Magic Wormhole
Get things from one computer to another, safely
| Feature | Cloudreve | Magic Wormhole |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,485 | ★ 22,792 |
| First released | 2026 | 2016 |
| Replaces | — | WeTransfer, AirDrop |
Why pick each one
Choose Cloudreve if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 28.5k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose Magic Wormhole if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 22.8k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Cloudreve or Magic Wormhole better?
Neither is universally better. Cloudreve has the larger community, while Magic Wormhole is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Cloudreve and Magic Wormhole free and open-source?
Yes. Cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Magic Wormhole under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cloudreve and Magic Wormhole with Docker?
Cloudreve: yes. Magic Wormhole: check the project docs for container support.