Cloudprober vs Statping-ng
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cloudprober
Active probing for distributed systems and network reliability
VS
Statping-ng
Status page and monitoring server
| Feature | Cloudprober | Statping-ng |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 694 | ★ 1,986 |
| First released | 2017 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Catchpoint | UptimeRobot, Pingdom |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Cloudprober or Statping-ng better?
Statping-ng is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Cloudprober if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Cloudprober and Statping-ng free and open-source?
Yes. Cloudprober is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Statping-ng under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cloudprober and Statping-ng with Docker?
Cloudprober: yes. Statping-ng: yes.