Lunalytics vs Statping-ng
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Lunalytics
Simple self-hosted website and service uptime monitor
VS
Statping-ng
Status page and monitoring server
| Feature | Lunalytics | Statping-ng |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | CSS | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1 | ★ 1,986 |
| First released | 2023 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Better Uptime | UptimeRobot, Pingdom |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Lunalytics or Statping-ng better?
Neither is universally better. Statping-ng has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Lunalytics and Statping-ng free and open-source?
Yes. Lunalytics is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Statping-ng under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Lunalytics and Statping-ng with Docker?
Lunalytics: yes. Statping-ng: yes.